Login Form
Who's Online
We have 301 guests onlineQuickFAQ
FAQ Cloud
- 1 items are tagged with paypal
- 2 items are tagged with Using Joomla
- 4 items are tagged with virtuemart
- 6 items are tagged with web design
| Written by Dr. Charles McVety |
| Thursday, 07 April 2005 18:06 |
|
Supreme Court Tells PM - Parliament can not protect clergy Dear Clergy and Leaders: Religious freedom in In January Bishop Fred Henry wrote a letter to his parishioners stating ?Since homosexuality, adultery, prostitution and pornography undermine the foundations of the family, the basis of society, then the State must use its coercive power to . . . curtail them in the interests of the common good,''. Two individuals filed complaints and now the Alberta Human Rights Commission is investigating the Bishop. The Bishop believes this is an attempt to ?shut the churches out of this important debate on redefining marriage''. This threat of prosecution is taking place before the Government redefines marriage and makes Bill C-38 law. All law schools teach the Biblical principle that ?the law is a teacher?. If Bill C-38 becomes law it will teach our society to further disallow Biblical teaching on morality. In addition the new law will produce a generation of children inundated with teachings on same sex relations. A plethora of same sex marriage text books such as ?Mom and Mum are getting Married? are already printed and being taught. It only goes to reason that prosecutions will increase exponentially if Bill C-38 is passed. The proposed law places Clergy and people of faith at great risk and offers no real protection. Bill C-38 puts forward a guise of protection for Clergy; however, the Supreme Court has already ruled that the Federal Parliament cannot implement any protection. On December 9th, 2004 the Supreme Court of Canada advised Prime Minister Martin that protecting Clergy from being forced to marry same sex couples is ?ultra vires parliament?, beyond parliament?s jurisdiction. The Prime Minister knows that the proposed protection is not worth the paper it is written on. In addition, the proposed legislation provides no protection for religious facilities, church workers, congregation members or any other Canadians from being forced to participate in same sex marriage ceremonies. Several examples such as the Knights of Columbus, in B.C., Printer Scot Brockie in It is our obligation to take a stand against this assault on religious freedom. Some believe it is hopeless however we know that ?if God be for us who can be against us?? The vote on Bill C-38 is very close and your efforts could make the difference. I would like to ask you to do three things: 1. Pray. The great preacher J. Sidlow Baxter once said ?Men may spurn our appeals, reject our message, oppose our arguments, despise our persons, but they are helpless against our prayers.? 2. Teach. We must educate our parishioners to be good citizens and participate in democracy. On average just 50 committed workers help elect a Members of Parliament. Are there fifty righteous among us? If so then 3. Take Action. A PDF document (http://www.familyaction.org/PDFs/dM_CLERGYBRIEFING.pdf) has been produced by The Defend Marriage Coalition and provides suggestions for specific and meaningful actions that the spiritual leaders of I urge you to stand with CFAC and The Defend Marriage Coalition to protect marriage for our children and generations to come. We have the responsibility and are obligated to not allow the cornerstone of civilization, the pillar of society and the foundation of the Church to be redefined. We have the opportunity, the power and a responsibility to lead.
|




